Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
On September 9, 2000, the respondent Ana Landaverde (hereinafter the tenant) received a notice from her landlord, the appellant ATM One, LLC (hereinafter the landlord), advising her that she had until September 18, 2000, to cure her alleged violation of the maximum occupancy provision in the parties' lease agreement. We agree with the Appellate Term (ATM One, L.L.C. v Landaverde,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.