1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 307 A.D.2d
  5. 307 A.D.2d 843 (2003)
 

CROSSMAR, INC. v. PORTFOLIOSCOPE, INC.

307 A.D.2d 843 (2003)

762 N.Y.S.2d 878

CROSSMAR, INC., Appellant, v. PORTFOLIOSCOPE, INC., Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided August 14, 2003.

Where the language of a contract is clear and unambiguous, the contract must be interpreted by reference to that language alone, without resort to extrinsic evidence (see R/S Assoc. v New York Job Dev. Auth., 98 N.Y.2d 29, 32 [2002]). Here, the court properly held that the plain language of the Software Agreement, particularly its defined term "customers," required the conclusion that the license grant of exclusivity to plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases