PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court's order dismissing in part and denying in part his rule 3.800(a) motion. Because the trial court's order was issued while the appellant's direct appeal of judgment and sentence was pending, we reverse.
The trial court erred in ruling on the appellant's motion for postconviction relief while the appellant's case was the subject of a pending direct appeal. See Burch v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
