1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 829 A.2d
  5. 829 A.2d 237 (2003)
 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CATO INSTITUTE

No. 02-TX-403.

829 A.2d 237 (2003)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant, v. CATO INSTITUTE, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided July 24, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Wasserman, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Arabella W. Teal, Interim Corporation Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellant.

John P. McAllister, with whom Theodore R. Groom was the on brief, Washington, DC, for appellee.

Before REID and WASHINGTON, Associate Judges, and KERN, Senior Judge.

WASHINGTON, Associate Judge:

The District of Columbia appeals a ruling from the trial court, which concluded that property located at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., owned and used by the Cato Institute ("Cato"), should be exempt from real property tax under D.C.Code §§ 47-1002(8) and (18) (2001). The question before us is one purely of statutory interpretation. After reviewing the legislative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases