Petitioner's only claim on this appeal is that his urine sample, which tested positive for opiates, was taken in violation of respondent's regulation and directive. There is, however, nothing in either the regulation or the directive that prohibits the taking of successive samples where, as here, the correction officer who collected the samples had reason to believe that the first two samples were not urine and the officer obtained the required authorization for each sample...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
