U.S. v. JAMIESON

No. 3:02 CR 707.

189 F.Supp.2d 754 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. J. Richard JAMIESON, et al., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

February 27, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Knepp, II, Esq., Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, N. Stevens Newcomer, Esq., Newcomer & McCarter, John Richard Jamieson, Toledo, Susan Bogart, Esq., Law Offices Of Susan Bogart, Chicago, IL, for John Richard Jamieson (1), defendants.

John S. Pyle, Esq., Gold, Schwartz & Company, Cleveland, James A Capwill, Aurora, for James A Capwill (2), defendants.

David Lee Klucas, Esq., for Teddy Brindle (3), defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Deny Leave to Extend, to Dissolve, or in the Alternative to Modify the Government's Post-Indictment Ex Parte Restraining order and Grant a Hearing Related thereto. (Doc. No. 40.) For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendant's Motion for Hearing with conditions.

On January 18, 2002, after an indictment naming the Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases