Although the ex-husband's motion was denominated as one to stay the hearing before the Special Referee rather than to reargue the prior order directing the hearing (CPLR 2221 [d] [1]), such circumstance does not warrant reversal since courts in any event have continuing jurisdiction to reconsider prior interlocutory orders (see Liss v Trans Auto Sys.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.