MATTER OF WINKELMAN v. FUREY


97 N.Y.2d 711 (2002)

765 N.E.2d 851

739 N.Y.S.2d 355

In the Matter of JEFFREY M. WINKELMAN, Appellant, v. KELLY A. FUREY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 7, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Siegel, Kelleher & Khan, Buffalo (Brian R. Welsh of counsel), for appellant.

No submission for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The issue whether the Appellate Division properly affirmed Family Court's award of counsel fees to respondent is now moot. The only issue before us is whether appellant's request for sanctions below was properly denied. On this record, we cannot say as a matter of law that the denial of appellant's request for sanctions was an abuse of discretion (see...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases