Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The father contends that an oral modification of the parties' stipulation of settlement required him to pay only 50% of his son's college tuition and related expenses rather than 100%. However, the father failed to show new consideration to support the alleged oral modification (see, Schwartzreich v Bauman-Basch, Inc., 231 N.Y. 196, 203; Estate of Anglin v Estate of Kelley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.