1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 302 F.3d
  5. 302 F.3d 384 (2002)
 

U.S. v. MIGGINS

Nos. 00-6708, 00-6709 and 01-5198.

302 F.3d 384 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald MIGGINS, Edward McDaniels, and Charles Moore, Jr., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: August 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van S. Vincent (argued and briefed), Asst. U.S. Attorney, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donald Miggins, Nashville, TN, Hershell D. Koger (briefed), for Pulaski, TN, for Defendant-Appellant in 00-6708.

William B. Bruce (briefed), Bruce, Weathers, Corley & Lyle, Nashvill, TN, for Defendant-Appellant in 00-6709.

Jack E. Seaman (argued and briefed), Lyell, Seaman & Shelton, Nashville, TN, for Defendant-Appellant in 01-5198.

Before: NELSON, SILER, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

CLAY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Donald Miggins, Edward McDaniels and Charles Moore, Jr. appeal from the respective criminal judgments entered against them arising from drug trafficking. Miggins challenges his sentence, while McDaniels and Moore claim that the district court erred in denying their suppression motions. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court's judgments.

BACKGROUND

Defendants' convictions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases