1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 292 A.D.2d
  5. 292 A.D.2d 282 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. BROOKER

292 A.D.2d 282 (2002)

739 N.Y.S.2d 255

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID BROOKER, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 26, 2002.

Defendant's claim that the suppression hearing should have been reopened based on alleged contradictions between hearing and trial testimony is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no discrepancy that would have affected the outcome of the hearing (see, People v Meachem, 288 A.D.2d 162

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases