VASQUEZ v. ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL


297 A.D.2d 269 (2002)

746 N.Y.S.2d 485

JESUS VASQUEZ, Respondent, v. ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL et al., Respondents, and JAMES B. GABRIEL, M.D., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided August 29, 2002.


Defendant Dr. Gabriel did not meet his burden to prove that no questions of fact exist (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324). In support of his motion for summary judgment, defendant Dr. Gabriel stated that he had nothing to do with plaintiff's care at defendant hospital, and that this is not the first time he has been confused with another "Gabriel" connected with defendant hospital. In opposition, plaintiff submitted portions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases