THOMSON v. CITY OF LEWISTON

No. 26881.

50 P.3d 488 (2002)

137 Idaho 473

Brent THOMSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LEWISTON; Urban Renewal, Agency, City of Lewiston, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, April 2002 Term.

July 1, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin L. Litteneker, Lewiston, for appellant.

Clements, Brown & McNichols, Lewiston, for respondent. Bentley G. Stromberg argued.


TROUT, Chief Justice.

I.

NATURE OF THE CASE

This is an appeal from the district judge's dismissal based on lack of standing, of Appellant Brent Thomson's (Thomson) complaint seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating the City of Lewiston's (City) creation of an urban renewal plan (Plan) pursuant to Chapter 20, Title 50, Idaho Code. We affirm.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 18, 1999, the City adopted Resolution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases