J. Marshall OSBORN and Center for Equal Opportunity, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross-Appellants-Petitioners,
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Oral argument April 30, 2002.
Decided July 2, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the plaintiffs-respondents-cross appellants-petitioners there were briefs by Daniel Kelly and Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Daniel Kelly.
For the defendant-appellant-cross respondent the cause was argued by Alan Lee, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.
An amicus curiae brief was filed by Michael D. Dean and Dean & McKoy, S.C., Waukesha, and Lucy A. Dalglish, Gregg P. Leslie, and Youngmee Moon, Arlington, Virginia, on behalf of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and Student Press Law Center.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
¶ 1. N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.
In this case, we review a court of appeals' decision, Osborn v. Board ofRegents of the University of Wisconsin System, 2001 WI App 209, 247 Wis.2d 957, 634 N.W.2d 563, regarding whether the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (hereinafter the University) must provide documents in response...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.