The motion court properly found that plaintiff tenant was in violation of its commercial lease with defendant owners by reason of its assignment of the lease in violation of the clause therein relating to subletting or assignment. Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the assignment at issue did not meet the lease criteria for dispensing with defendant landlords' consent to assignment. Such consent to assignment admittedly not having been obtained by plaintiff, plaintiff's breach...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.