Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied in all respects. As they followed defendant and his codefendant and kept them under surveillance, the police did nothing to limit their freedom of movement (see, People v Howard,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.