1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 118 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 (2002)
 

PEOPLE v. WILLIS

No. S096349.

118 Cal.Rptr.2d 301 (2002)

27 Cal.4th 811

43 P.3d 130

The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Edward Charles WILLIS, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

April 4, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tara M. Mulay, San Francisco, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, David P. Druliner and Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Carol Wendelin Pollack and Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorneys General, William T. Harter, Kenneth C. Byrne, Marc E. Turchin and April S. Rylaarsdam, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

CHIN, J.

Under existing law, when either party in a criminal case succeeds in showing that the opposing party has improperly exercised peremptory challenges to exclude members of a cognizable group, the court must dismiss all the jurors thus far selected, and quash the remaining venire. (People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258, 282, 148 Cal.Rptr. 890<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases