UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 1, 2002.
November 1, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Philip Beck, Mary Jean Moltenbrey, Jacqueline S. Kelley, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Renata B. Hesse, Phillip R. Malone, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div. Washington, DC, for U.S.
Steven F. Benz, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen Todd & Evans, PLLC, Washington, DC, for California plaintiffs.
Jeffrey Blumenfeld, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, Washington, DC, for NetAction and Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
Jay Ward Brown, Levine, Sullivan & Koch, LLP, Washington, DC, for Cable News Network, LP, LLP, Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Los Angeles Times, Associated Press, Washington Post, USA Today.
Donald L. Flexner, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, for SBC Communications, Inc.
Judith L. Harris, Reed Smith, LLP, Washington, DC, for Novell, Inc.
Jay L. Himes, N.Y. Dept. of Law, New York City, for Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Ill., State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, State of Mich., State of N.Y., State of N.C., State of Ohio.
Steven L. Holley, Richard J. Iroksky, John L. Warden, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, William H. Neukom. Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, Bradley Paul Smith, Sullivan & Cromwell, Washington, DC, for Microsoft.
Michael Lenett, Cuneo Law Group, Washington, DC, for American Antitrust Institute, Inc.
Bradley S. Lui, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Washington, DC, Jason M. Mahler, Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n, Washington, DC, for Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n.
Glenn B. Manishin, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, Washington, DC, for Software & Information Industry Ass'n.
Aileen Meyer, Washington, DC, for San Jose Mercury News, Inc.
Peter Peckarsky, Washington, DC, for Relpromax Antitrust, Inc.
Gene C. Schaerr, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP, for Association for Competitive Technology.
Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr., Williams & Connolly, LLP, Washington, DC, for District of Columbia, State of Cal., State of Conn., State of Fla., State of Iowa, State of Kan., State of Mass., State of Minn., State of Utah.
Kenneth W. Starr, Kirkland & Ellis, Washington, DC, for ProComp.
James S. Turner, Swankin & Turner, Washington, DC, for Consumers for Computing Choice and Open Platform Working Group, Free Software Foundation, Andreas Pour, Dan Kegel, John Carroll, Mason Thomas.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Remaining in this case for the Court's determination is the resolution of a single issue: whether entry of the final judgment proposed by the parties is in the public interest. The Court makes this determination pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act ("Tunney Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(h). In a previous Memorandum Opinion, the Court reviewed the pertinent procedural history and determined...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.