Lori SUMMERFIELD, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
WINDSOR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants and Appellants.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 31, 2002.
Review Denied May 1, 2002.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert J. Henry, Lawrence M. Schoenke, Santa Rosa, School and College Legal Services, for Appellants Windsor Unified School District et al.
Margaret A. Chidester, Tustin, and Cathie L. Fields, for California School Boards Association's Education Legal Alliance, Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants Windsor Unified School District et al.
James D. Allen, San Diego, for Respondent Lori Summerfield.
Ernest H. Tuttle, III, Kay M. Tuttle, Tuttle & McCloskey, Fresno, for California Teachers Association, Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent Lori Summerfield.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
PARRILLI, J.
Although amendments to Education Code section 449111 have been in effect for close to 20 years, no appellate court has interpreted them. This case requires us to do so. Lori Summerfield successfully petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate directing the Windsor Unified School District and its governing board (collectively, the District) to employ her as a permanent certificated teacher and compensate her for accrued...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
