1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 768 N.E.2d
  5. 768 N.E.2d 940 (2002)
 

PENN-HARRIS-MADISON SCHOOL CORP. v. JOY

No. 71A04-0010-CV-437.

768 N.E.2d 940 (2002)

PENN-HARRIS-MADISON SCHOOL CORPORATION, Appellant-Defendant, v. Tianna JOY, et al., Appellees-Plaintiffs.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

May 29, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julia Blackwell Gelinas, Thomas E. Wheeler, II, Deborah K. Hepler, Locke Reynolds LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

David R. Hoffman, Mishawaka, IN, Attorney for Appellees.

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Statement of the Case

Penn-Harris-Madison School Corporation (Penn) challenges the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Tianna Joy, four other students, and two parents of Penn students (collectively, the Students), after the court found that Penn's drug testing program violated the Search and Seizure Clause—Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution (Section 11). Because this case presents an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases