NANCE v. SUN LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF CANADA

No. 01-6234.

294 F.3d 1263 (2002)

Bryan K. NANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 2, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen Mullins, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Arlen E. Fielden of Crowe & Dunlevy, Oklahoma City, OK, and Mark E. Schmidtke of Hoeppner Wagner & Evans LLP, Valparaiso, IN, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before SEYMOUR, McKAY, and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.


HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Bryan K. Nance appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (Sun Life) on his claim for long-term disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The district court ruled that Sun Life's decision to deny benefits based on Plaintiff's back condition and depression was not arbitrary or capricious. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases