BUONO v. NORTON

No. EDCV01216RTSGLX.

212 F.Supp.2d 1202 (2002)

Frank BUONO & Allen Schwartz, Plaintiffs, v. Gale NORTON, John Reynolds, & Mary Martin, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

July 24, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Rosenbaum, Peter J. Eliasberg, ACLU Foundation of Southern Cal., Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs.

Charles R. Shockey, AUSA Office of Atty. Gen., Environmental & Natural Resources Div., Sacramento, CA, for defendants.


ORDER 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS FRANK BUONO'S AND ALLEN SCHWARTZ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND 2) DENYING DEFENDANTS GALE NORTON'S, JOHN REYNOLDS', AND MARY MARTIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TIMLIN, District Judge.

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered Plaintiffs Frank Buono ("Buono") and Allen Schwartz ("Schwartz") (collectively, "Plaintiffs")'s Motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56 ("Rule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases