1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 281 F.3d
  5. 281 F.3d 837 (2002)
 

COHN v. PETSMART, INC.

No. 00-35328.

281 F.3d 837 (2002)

Mike COHN, D.V.M., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PETSMART, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 12, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ken J. Pedersen, Pedersen & Company, PLLC, Boise, ID, for appellant.

John W. Crittenden, Kathryn M. Wheble, Nate A. Garhart, Cooley Godward LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the appellee.

Before: BROWNING, WALLACE, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Dr. Mike Cohn appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment on his claim that Petsmart infringes his trademark "Where Pets are Family." He presents two issues: 1) whether the amount in controversy required for diversity jurisdiction was satisfied, and 2) whether there is a likelihood of confusion in Petsmart's use of Cohn's mark. We hold the amount in controversy requirement was met and that there is no likelihood of confusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases