1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 286 F.3d
  5. 286 F.3d 749 (2002)
 

U.S. v. BARILE

No. 00-4926.

286 F.3d 749 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael BARILE, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Joseph Sedwick Sollers, III, King & Spalding, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Bryan Edwin Foreman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland; Steven Neil Gersten, Trial Attorney, Office of Consumer Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Eugene M. Pfeifer, Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, King & Spalding, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Stephen M. Schenning, United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined.

OPINION

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Michael Barile was convicted of making materially false statements to the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 and 2. Barile challenges his conviction on the grounds that the district court erred by excluding impeachment evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases