TINDER v. PINKERTON SECURITY

No. 01-3876.

305 F.3d 728 (2002)

Ilah M. TINDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PINKERTON SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided September 17, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Kinne (argued), Gingras, Cates & Luebke, Madison, WI, for plaintiff-appellant.

Amy O. Bruchs (argued), Michael, Best & Friedrich, Madison, WI, for defendant-appellee.

BEFORE: MANION, ROVNER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


MANION, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue presented in this appeal is what constitutes sufficient consideration to support an agreement in Wisconsin to arbitrate between an employer and an at-will employee. The appellant, Ilah M. Tinder, sued her former employer, Pinkerton Security, for employment discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. Citing what it claimed was an enforceable agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases