1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 267 F.3d
  5. 267 F.3d 729 (2001)
 

U.S. v. SCOTT

Nos. 00-3130, 00-3149, 00-3150.

267 F.3d 729 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SCOTT, Carl Buchholz, and Gregory Sumpter, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 4, 2001.

Rehearing Denied November 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frances C. Hulin, Timothy A. Bass (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Springfield, IL, for United States of America.

David B. Mote (argued), Office of the Fed. Pub. Def., Springfield, IL, for David Scott.

Patrick T. Timoney, Springfield, IL, Ronald E. Jenkins (argued), Jenkins & Kling, Clayton, MO, for Carl Bucholz.

Ronald E. Jenkins (argued), Jenkins & Kling, Clayton, MO, for Gregory Sumpter.

Before COFFEY, RIPPLE and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted the defendants, David Scott, Carl Buchholz and Gregory Sumpter, of possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Scott and Buchholz also were charged with, and convicted of, carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The defendants now appeal their convictions on numerous grounds. For the reasons set forth in the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases