TWO THIRTY NINE JOINT VENTURE v. JOE

No. 05-98-01775-CV.

60 S.W.3d 896 (2001)

TWO THIRTY NINE JOINT VENTURE, Appellant, v. Harry J. JOE, Individually, and Jenkens & Gilchrist, A Professional Corporation, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

November 20, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald E. Godwin, David Patterson, Boyd A. Mouse, Godwin, White & Gruber, P.C., Dallas, for Appellant.

B. Prater Monning, III, Monning & Wynne, L.L.P., Dallas, Michael P. Lynn, John T. Cox, Lynn Stodghill Melsheimer & Tillotson, L.L.P., Dallas, for Appellee.

Before Justices FITZGERALD, RICHTER, and ROSENBERG.


OPINION

BARBARA ROSENBERG, Justice (Assigned).

Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture (239 JV) brought suit for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty and duty of loyalty against Harry J. Joe, individually, and his law firm, Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C. (J & G). The basis of the suit was that Joe and J & G breached their duty of loyalty to 239 JV when neither Joe nor the law firm disclosed that Joe, as a member of the Irving City Council, would or could...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases