1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 256 F.3d
  5. 256 F.3d 648 (2001)
 

SIEBERT v. SEVERINO

No. 00-2654.

256 F.3d 648 (2001)

Robert SIEBERT and Pamela Siebert, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David SEVERINO, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided July 6, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Stanczak (argued), Dunn, Ulbrich, Hundman, Stanczak & Ogar, Bloomington, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Elizabeth R. Schenkier (argued), Office of the Atty. Gen., Civ. Appeals Div., Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before BAUER, MANION, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

David Severino, a volunteer investigator for the Illinois Department of Agriculture, seized three horses owned by Pamela Siebert, after having searched a barn owned by Pamela and her husband Robert. After the Sieberts got the horses back, they sued Severino under Section 1983, alleging that he violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and deprived them of their property — three horses —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases