The central question presented by this appeal is whether all 10,856 shares of stock were issued to plaintiff, which, by the terms of the parties' agreement, would terminate the master lease. Contrary to the conclusion reached by Supreme Court, we find no question of fact concerning this issue that would preclude a grant of summary judgment in plaintiff's favor.
While it is true that plaintiff initially demanded that defendant issue all 10,865 shares (a demand that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
