1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 248 F.3d
  5. 248 F.3d 577 (2001)
 

GEORGE WATTS & SON, INC. v. TIFFANY AND CO.

No. 00-3231.

248 F.3d 577 (2001)

GEORGE WATTS & SON, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIFFANY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided April 16, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Janssen (argued), Quarles & Brady, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff-appellant.

K. Scott Wagner (argued), Hale & Wagner, Milwaukee, WI, for defendant-appellee.

Before EASTERBROOK, DIANE P. WOOD, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

For many years George Watts & Son sold Tiffany's products in Wisconsin. After receiving a notice ending that arrangement, Watts filed suit, asserting that Tiffany had violated both the contract between the parties and the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, Wis. Stat. ch. 135. Before the case could be decided, Watts and Tiffany decided that they preferred arbitration to litigation. The parties received the principal benefit of that bargain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases