Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly dismissed their cause of action based on Labor Law § 240 (1). The metal steps from which the injured plaintiff fell were a "normal appurtenance to the [subway tunnel] and [were] not designed as a safety device to protect him from an elevation-related risk" (Norton...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.