Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint. The appellant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the respondent's retention of certain marital property constituted unjust enrichment (see, Sharp v Kosmalski,
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Gould v Board of Educ.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.