Substantial testimonial and documentary evidence that petitioner, a licensed plumber, made harassing phone calls to an elderly woman in which he threatened her property, and made her fear for her safety if she did not pay a disputed bill issued by petitioner, supports respondent's revocation of petitioner's gun permits. In light of such evidence, we find no abuse of discretion by respondent (Matter of Fondacaro v Kelly,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF HAUCK v. SAFIR
282 A.D.2d 403 (2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 9
In the Matter of ROBERT N. HAUCK, Appellant, v. HOWARD SAFIR, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 26, 2001.
Decided April 26, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.