Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because the testimony of the eyewitnesses was contradicted by objective evidence and thus was incredible as a matter of law is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.