Defendants' contentions regarding the court's jury instructions are unpreserved, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal. According to the transcript, at one point in the charge, the court made an inadvertent omission of the word "cross-examination" resulting in a misstatement of law that went unnoticed by all counsel; however, the court's instructions as a whole as well as the summation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.