1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 146 F.Supp.2d
  5. 146 F.Supp.2d 498 (2001)
 

IPPV ENTERPRISES v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS

Civ.A. No. 99-577-RRM.

146 F.Supp.2d 498 (2001)

IPPV ENTERPRISES, LLC, and MAAST, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; NagraVision, S.A.; and NagraStar, L.L.C., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 3, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Heisman, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Frederick G. Michaud, Jr., David M. Schlitz, S. Lloyd Smith, Mark R. Kresloff, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P., Alexandria, VA, for plaintiffs.

Donald F. Parsons, Jr., Rodger D. Smith, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, Philip L. Cohan, Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. Plaintiff IPPV Enterprises, LLC is a Nevada limited liability corporation with its principal place of business in Reno, Nevada. IPPV owns U.S.Patent Nos. 4,163,254 (the '254 patent); 4,225,884 (the '884 patent); 4,528,589 (the '589 patent); and 4,484,217 (the '217 patent). Plaintiff MAAST, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Sparks, Nevada. MAAST owns U.S.Patent No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases