BALL v. SANO


282 A.D.2d 330 (2001)

723 N.Y.S.2d 644

JOHN C. BALL et al., Appellants, v. OMAR SANO et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 19, 2001.


The IAS court's denial of plaintiffs' motion to restore for failure to comply with a scheduling order was an improvident exercise of discretion. Weighed against the merits of the claim and the lack of prejudice to defendants, counsel's neglect is inconsequential (see, Sanchez v Javind Apt. Corp., 246 A.D.2d 353, 355). The merits of plaintiffs' case are demonstrated by their bill of particulars...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases