Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the non-City defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's note of issue and in granting plaintiff's motion to preclude the non-City defendants from, inter alia, conducting a physical examination of plaintiff. Although the non-City defendants timely moved within 20 days to strike plaintiff's note of issue, the non-City defendants failed to establish that plaintiff's certificate of readiness
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATEO v. CITY OF NEW YORK
282 A.D.2d 313 (2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 362
MYRNA MATEO et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and REGINE'S ORIGINALS, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 17, 2001.
Decided April 17, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
