The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning credibility and evaluation of expert testimony.
Testimony concerning defendant's prior reckless handling of his gun while off duty was properly admitted to negate various aspects of his defense. The evidence was particularly probative because defendant and the deceased were the only persons...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
