UCM v. INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

No. S091117.

114 Cal.Rptr.2d 459 (2001)

26 Cal.4th 1185

36 P.3d 2

UTILITY COST MANAGEMENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

December 17, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul G. Kerkorian, Fresno, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John L. Bukey, Corona, Richard L. Hamilton; Somach, Simmons & Dunn, Michael E. Vergara, Sacramento, and Erica R. Williams, for California School Board Association's Education Legal Alliance as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

James E. Hoist, George L. Marchand, Oakland; and Marcia J. Canning, for the Regents of the University of California and University of California Hastings College of the Law as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

McMurtrey & Hartsock, Robert W. Hartsock, Bakersfield; McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, James P. Wagoner, Fresno, Christopher Lozano and Jay A. Christofferson for Defendant and Respondent.

Lagerlof, Senecal, Bradley, Gosney & Kruse and Thomas S. Bunn III, Pasadena, for Association of California Water Agencies as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

Robert C. Helwick, Craig S. Spencer, Benjamin T. Reyes II, Oakland; Fox & Sohagi, Margaret Moore Sohagi, Terry Kaufmann Macias, Los Angeles, Philip A. Seymour, Santa Barbara; and Roberta L. Larson, for East Bay Municipal Utility District and California Association of Sanitation Agencies as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

Louise H. Renne, City Attorney (San Francisco), Joanne Hoeper, Chief Trial Attorney, and Jason P. Gonzalez, Deputy City Attorney, for the City and County of San Francisco and the Cities of Alameda, Monterey, San Buenaventura, San Luis Obispo, Santa Rosa and Walnut Creek as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

Lemieux & O'Neill and Wayne K. Lemieux, Westlake Village, for Central Basin Municipal Water District, Foothill Municipal Water District, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Littlerock Creek Irrigation District, Palm Ranch Irrigation District, San Gabriel County Water District, Valley County Water District and West Basin Municipal Water District as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.


BROWN, J.

In this case, we decide whether the 120 day statute of limitations set forth in Government Code section 66022 1 applies to an action by a public agency to recover amounts paid to a public utility for capital improvements. We conclude section 66022 does apply, and therefore appellant's complaint is barred as untimely. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases