1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 242 F.3d
  5. 242 F.3d 315 (2001)
 

WILLIAMS v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT

No. 00-10361.

242 F.3d 315 (2001)

Charles Etta WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 22, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Clayton Isbell (argued), Law Office of William C. Isbell, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Harold R. McKeever (argued), Patricia Merian Reed, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before POLITZ, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Charles Etta Williams appeals the dismissal of her suit against Dallas Area Rapid Transit ("DART") under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., arguing that the district court erred in finding DART immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. She contends both that DART is not an arm of the state for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment and that, even if DART otherwise were entitled to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases