Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is denied.
The Supreme Court improperly exercised its discretion in granting the motion of the defendant Linda Clipper for a protective order. Clipper failed to make an appropriate factual showing of "unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage, or other prejudice" (CPLR 3103 [a]; see, Willis v Cassia,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.