The record is sufficiently ambiguous with respect to whether or not defendant was present at the sidebar conferences during the second round of jury selection, December 2, 1998, to warrant a reconstruction hearing (see, People v Odiat,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CAMARENA
282 A.D.2d 210 (2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 380
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JULIO CAMARENA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 3, 2001.
Decided April 3, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
