Viewed against the six-month old findings of defendants' orthopedist to the effect that plaintiff sustained cervical and low back sprains that had fully resolved, plaintiff's chiropractor's affidavit is inadequate to raise an issue of fact as to whether plaintiff sustained a significant limitation or permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ, member, function or system, since it does not specify the degree of limitation
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GJELAJ v. LUDDE
281 A.D.2d 211 (2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 643
KATRINA GJELAJ, Appellant, v. EDMOND J. LUDDE et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 8, 2001.
Decided March 8, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
