CANTALINO v. DANNER


96 N.Y.2d 391 (2001)

754 N.E.2d 164

729 N.Y.S.2d 405

JO-ANN CANTALINO, Appellant, v. JACQUELINE DANNER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 28, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Genovesi, Landicino & Genovesi, L. L. P., Brooklyn (Anthony J. Genovesi, Jr., of counsel), for appellant.

Lifshutz, Polland & Hoffman, P. C., New York City (John W. Burns and Elliot R. Polland of counsel), for respondent.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Linda H. Young and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for City of New York, amicus curiae.

Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY, ROSENBLATT and GRAFFEO concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge KAYE.

Is a dismissal in the interest of justice a "favorable termination" for purposes of a malicious prosecution action? Under the circumstances here, we conclude that it is, since the court's reasons for dismissing the criminal charges were not inconsistent with the innocence of the accused.

This case arises out of the bitterly contested divorce of plaintiff from her husband. The husband, a lieutenant in the New...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases