Defendant's claim that the court should have sua sponte delivered an interested witness charge is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's general charge on assessing credibility was sufficient, since the alleged benefits received by prosecution witnesses were made clear to the jury throughout the trial and stressed by the defense in summation (see, People v Inniss,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. GARRETT
281 A.D.2d 195 (2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 492
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL GARRETT, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 8, 2001.
Decided March 8, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
