Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The evidence adduced at the hearing sufficiently establishes probable cause for defendant's arrest because the only rational inference to be drawn from the facts is that the nontestifying arresting officer, who at all times was in close proximity to his testifying partner, also saw an apparent drug transaction between defendant and a purchaser (Matter of Jose R.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
