It is our view that plaintiff failed to exercise his option to purchase the subject building by placing a condition upon the option, i.e., that the building be vacant at the time of transfer. "It is a fundamental principle of contract law that a valid acceptance must comply with the terms of the offer * * * and, if qualified with conditions it is equivalent to a rejection and counteroffer" (Roer v Cross County Med. Ctr. Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LAMANNA v. WING YUEN REALTY, INC.
283 A.D.2d 165 (2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 54
FRANK LAMANNA, Respondent, v. WING YUEN REALTY, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 1, 2001.
Decided May 1, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.