The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Since the showup was conducted in reasonably close temporal and spatial proximity to the robbery and was the culmination of an unbroken chain of investigative events in which the victim was rushed to a location where defendant and his companions were being held, the various claimed defects in the showup procedure did not render it unduly suggestive (People v Stewart,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MIXON
281 A.D.2d 152 (2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 509
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES MIXON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 1, 2001.
Decided March 1, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.