The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification. Although defendant wore a mask during most of the incident, an identifying witness, who had seen defendant almost daily for a period of years, had a sufficient opportunity to observe and recognize him without his mask immediately before the robbery (see, People v...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.